Conceptualising trust in the context of public service delivery in regional Australia

This rapid review of selective academic and practice-based literatures has helped us to establish the constituent elements of an analytical framework for identifying the drivers of trust in government services and, by implication, the barriers and potential enablers to service delivery. As Figure 3 illustrates, we hypothesize that public trust in government services is driven by a combination of demand and supply-side factors that shape service expectations and satisfaction.

The critical demand-side factors include citizen perceptions derived from direct personal and network experiences of service provision. These perceptions are also informed by socio-economic, political and environmental factors. The critical supply-side factors include citizen perceptions of the service culture, organisational capacity and capability and experience.

These demand and supply-side factors can be understood as a series of micro-contracts between government and citizen that either undermine or promote trust in government services depending on the quality of service provision and the changing environmental context.

Image
An infographic showing the relationship between trust in democracy, trust in government and trust in APS service. It shows that each of these feed into each other. It then expands on Trust in APS service, showing that trust in APS service is dependent on the APS service delivery experience. This in turn is driven by the expectations of the service and the satisfaction with the service. Expectations is driven by demand side factors such as direct experience, norms and values, social network experience, and environmental effects both socio-economic and political, as well as supply side factors such as service culture, capacity and capability, service complexity and communications.  Satisfaction is driven by demand-side factors such as location and accessibility, as well as supply side factors such as staff professionalism and competence, service quality and governance and integrity.
Figure 3. Framework for understanding perceptions of trust in APS public service